|
Tuesday, April 04, 2006(UTC)
|
|
Sunday, March 17, 2013 9:42:22 AM(UTC)
|
34
[0.01% of all post / 0.01 posts per day] |
|
5
(View High Fives)
|
|
12
|
|
6
|
 View All Posts by User
|
<How has the new rule made it easier for AD's to police?>
Because it's no longer in effect..... thought that was self explanatory.
The rule was outdated...no need to change the punishment - changing the rule was the right call.
|
Blade wrote:a fan wrote:
Q: With the new rule it states cannot involve head coaches, but can assistant coaches and others associated with the particular program work with the student-athletes?
A: No. The rule states "school coaches" which includes head coaches, assistant coaches, volunteer coaches, and coaches who may be coaching the next year.
Also, the athlete may not participate in the same sport during the school season with a nonschool team. A student becomes ineligible in a sport for the remainder of the season for competing in a nonschool game, meet, or contest in the same sport during the season of practice and competition established by the school.
Continuing to prohibit offseason contact by asst coaches is different than what the Appleton PC article stated. If that hasn't changed I wouldn't feel so strongly that this will change much in the minds or in th echoices of HS athletes. APC is incorrect.....neither the head coach or the assistant coaches may coach outside of summer contact days. To help clarify the decision - the driving force behind the rule was the inability of AD's to police what their athletes were doing on club volleyball, club soccer, AAU basketball, softball leagues, etc. In addition the consequences could include forfeiture from the state tournament. With that type of liability placed on AD's and the difficulty in policing the athletes it became a no brainer in my opinion.
|
DB wrote:travis wrote:DB wrote:crusaderpride wrote:sportsfan wrote:I think that the WIAA needs to put in a multiplier based on total population within a 30 mile radius of each school.
I'm sure some formula could be created. It can be tied to the US Census. I'd like to see a broader trend demonstrated first. Again, why are Newman's girls always so good while their boys are consistently not? (To use one of myriad examples). I very much doubt that population is e culprit. It absolutely boggles my mind that people can't understand the differences between rural and urban America, and what comes with living in each. And this is from a guy who grew up in a metropolitan area of a million people...  I can follow and accept an urban/rural argument much more than I can simply a public/private argument. I also think it's important to consider if an advantage is being gained. While open enrollment has limitations (mostly related to how far people will drive to send their kids), there are no doubts some public schools have gained significant advantages from open enrollment. Oh, for sure. But the crux of this argument rests on who stands to gain the most, and where it concerns public schools, that tends to be the schools with enrollments north of 1,000. The same schools who may be just a mile or two from the Aquinas's, Roncalli's, Dominican's and yes, even the Madison Abundant Life's of the world. I've never had an issue with teams like WISCO playing D2 in b-ball or D3 in football, simply because they are often playing public high schools that are in reasonably comparable geographic locations. West De Pere, for example, has a fairly large population base it could potentially draw from. But when Dominican is playing Grantsburg?  On a side note, it's always bothered me, that it was OK for the Dominican's and St. Cat's to play Marquette, Pius and Xavier in the WISAA state tournament...all schools double to triple their actual enrollment, but if they had to do that in the WIAA, it'd be a huge injustice? When Dominican competed in the WISAA state basketball tourney they had between 400-500 students - not the current enrollment of approximately 300. In fact, in the last year of WISAA (2000), Dominican had dropped down to D2 for the tourney.
|
crusaderpride wrote:snoopaloop wrote:Is Taylor playing anywhere next year? Dominican again, presumably. He's just a freshman. Stone is the freshman. Taylor has not yet decided where he will play next year.
|
pogue wrote:One cannot blame Dominican for following the rules. But I personally wouldn't get on here and brag up the fact that an urban school was able to recruit players from multiple feeder schools in the largest population base in the state, then participate in the state tourney in D4? Nope...what a noble accomplishment. Gosh, how proud they must be. Who is bragging up Dominican?
|
faststew wrote:hs bball fan wrote:UND10 wrote:Showalter will get it. Many people that I have been talking to are saying this is one of the best Wisconsin High School basketball teams that the state has seen over the last 10 years. Germantowns 6-10 could beat alot of teams so is that coaching having being able to win when your second five could be a top 15 team in the state? Have you seen Gtown play? A huge part of their success is coaching. Yes they do have a lot of talent, but the way Showalter has these kids play during a game makes them as good as they are. I think he should be coach of the year, and if they go undefeated and win state, there is no question that he should win it. Forrest Gump could coach this talented Germantown team to a state title. I said alot earlier in the year, this is the best high school basketball team ive ever seen. The height and depth of them and their relentlessness is hard to match. Just for arguments sake..... When Germantown played East Troy without Fischer I'd ask the question - at what position was Germantown so overwhelmingly better than East Troy? Probably Zak Showalter and that's it. One might even argue that East Troy may have had a slightly better match-up at every other position. So....it could be argued that the 22 point win was a little bit Zak and a lot of coaching.
|
sportsfan wrote:crusaderpride wrote:DB wrote:
Milwaukee Washington 80
Milwaukee Hamilton 73 (OT)
Hamilton's Kevon Looney hit a 3/4 court shot to send it into OT according to Mark Stewart's Twitter.
Video of the shot from FS Wisconsin: http://www.snappytv.com/...consin-winter-prep-zone
Nice job by security keeping people off the court  I've seen larger crowds at a D5 game.....and this is a D1 matchup with a ranked team? Nice to see this is what the Milwaukee folk consider a court storming act. Unlike many of the small towns around the state there were probably 40 games in the Milwaukee area to attend and 2-3 city games that were as good or better match-ups. Check out the Milwaukee crowds as we get into the playoffs and a few of the teams are eliminated - they'll be much better.
|
|
The Jordan Brand Classic is in North Carolina.
J.P. has committed to North Carolina, Sam Dekker has committed to Wisconsin.
I think that explains things.
|
HSHoops wrote:luvthemhoops wrote:December 2nd Dominican 100 SJNMA 34,same thing.
Dominican had all 13 of its players score in that game - many of them more than 1 basket. There was no backcourt pressure from the middle of the third quarter and players 9-13 played the entire 4th quarter. While you're in the mood for comparisons why don't you check out this link and let me know what you think might of happened in the second half if Dominican was interested in running up the score. http://www.wissports.net...rtID=1&gameID=237490
|
luvthemhoops wrote:December 2nd Dominican 100 SJNMA 34,same thing.
Dominican had all 13 of its players score in that game - many of them more than 1 basket. There was no backcourt pressure from the middle of the third quarter and players 9-13 played the entire 4th quarter.
|
|